Patents filed · IP Australia · Takze #2026903701 · Consilium #2026904026

Now debating

Two diamonds meeting at a single contact point, one shattering, the other revealing a gold tip

Strategic intelligence
for hard decisions.

Most AI gives you the answer. Takze gives you the answer that survived.

One question. One emailed verdict. 48 hours.

Decisions Takze handles

Drop your hard decision.

Should we deploy $40M in centralised EV infrastructure?

One question. One emailed verdict. 48 hours.

Your decision is tested adversarially.

house
Deploy the full budget now and take the position first.
challenger
First-mover on what? The capacity isn't there in time.
caught
Claimed independence, then leaned on the very thing it dismissed.

Competing positions are generated, then attacked from every angle. Each claim is challenged until the strongest position survives, or breaks. Rooted in 1500 years of Nalanda dialectical tradition.

Then a second engine builds the execution plan.

Analyze
Build
Stress-test

The second engine takes the surviving position and builds a complete execution brief: strategy, weekly actions, hidden risks, and where the analysis was most contested.

Tibetan monks in monastery courtyard debate

For 1500 years, in monasteries from Nalanda to Lhasa, dialectical debate has been used to find which positions survive examination.

A monk strikes their hand and calls Tsa! the moment they catch a contradiction. The strike is the moment a position breaks.

Takze brings that method to modern decisions. Rooted in that tradition, your decision is debated until one position holds. Then the plan is built.

Grounded in historical precedent and strategic pattern recognition.

Every recommendation is tested against a library of historical strategic cases, including decisions that succeeded and decisions that failed. The engine identifies which strategic pattern your situation actually fits.

This is not generic advice. It is pattern-matched strategy, drawn from how comparable situations have actually unfolded.

The verdict, structured.

Point Execute the asymmetric strike instead of the patience strategy.
Reason The grid bottleneck will not resolve within the capital's effective lifetime.
Example P3 collapsed when forced to defend why behind-the-meter solutions could close a 19GW deficit before 2028.
Point The risk is regulatory backlash if the abandonment signal is read as bad faith.

Plus eliminated positions with reasoning, strike-by-strike contradictions, week-by-week execution in the paid brief.

Two engines.

Takze mark
Takze.
Decides what to do.
A 1-2 page brief in 48 hours. $500.
Consilium mark
Consilium.
Decides how to do it.
A 5-page execution plan in 48 hours. $2,000 (includes Takze).

Sample briefs.

Capital Allocation Under Regulatory Constraint

Execute the asymmetric strike, not the patience strategy: the grid bottleneck will not resolve within the capital's effective lifetime.

Read full brief →

Public Sector Cost Reduction Under Delivery Pressure

Do not execute the cut as announced: the saving in months 1 to 8 gets re-spent by month 18, plus recovery costs and damaged partner confidence.

Read full brief →

Pricing.

$500
Decision Brief
Takze engine. 1-2 pages. 48 hours.
$2,000
Full Brief
Takze + Consilium. 5 pages. Week-by-week execution. 48 hours.

Per engagement. No subscription. Enterprise and ongoing arrangements available, talk to us.

Have a hard decision ready to test?

Begin